Open Stack

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:24:24AM -0600, Kurt Taylor wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Team Nova,
> > >
> > > This is a message to alert everyone to the fact that the old hypervisor
> > > support matrix on the wiki[1], should really be considered obsolete.
> > >
> > > The canonical location for it going forward will be
> > >
> > >    http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/support-matrix.html
> > >
> > > That URL shows current GIT snapshot, releases will get their own URL
> > > when the time comes.
> > >
> > > The source for this document is part of Nova GIT in the path
> > >
> > >    doc/source/support-matrix.ini
> > >
> > > The docs are auto-generated from that ini file using a sphinx extension
> > >
> > >    doc/ext/support_matrix.py
> > >
> > > The CSS styling is in
> > >
> > >    doc/source/_static/support-matrix.css
> > >
> > > Some things to note here
> > >
> > >  - The new doc was populated based on the contents of the old wiki page
> > > from
> > >    about two months ago, so if there have been additions to the wiki in
> > > that
> > >    time, they might not all have been captured - depends how good I
> was at
> > >    figuring out changes.
> > >
> > >  - Improvements to the content and/or HTML styling should obviously be
> sent
> > >    as patches to Nova GIT in the files mentioned above, via normal
> Gerrit
> > >    review practice.
> > >
> > >  - Since it is in GIT, the support matrix is now able to record
> information
> > >    per release branch of Nova. So users can be clear about what
> features
> > >    their release of Nova supports, as opposed to playing guessing
> games.
> > >
> > >  - The in-tree document only covers features of the in-tree Nova
> drivers.
> > >    As such it does not include information about Docker or PowerKVM or
> > >    the (now deleted) BareMetal drivers. My currently suggestion is that
> > >    people maintaining out of tree drivers, should reuse the sphinx
> > > extension
> > >    to format their own support matrix ini file in their local GIT repo.
> > >
> >
> > I think that maybe you have confused PowerKVM with PowerVM.  The PowerVM
> > driver was removed, but PowerKVM support is in tree with libvirt.
>
> Ok, so the wiki page was indeed referring to the libvirt impl. That wasn't
> obvious since it didn't mention libvirt in the heading as all the other
> libvirt columns did ! Sorry for not copying across your data then.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>

No problem at all, here's the patch to add it:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153342/

Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150205/d49ef2af/attachment.html>