Open Stack

Le 05/02/2015 17:54, Sean Dague a écrit :
> On 02/05/2015 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
>>>
>>>> May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase to propose
>>>> items, then work through them 1 by 1. Or, we take items one by one
>>>> according to who shouts fastest but ask people not to interrupt.
>>> Or how about going through the ones listed on the agenda, rather than
>>> having a free-for-all shouting match?
>> Indeed, I thought that was the whole point of putting them in the
>> agenda in the first place :-)
> Agreed, I think it just got away from us today with lots of first time
> attendees. We'll just have to be a little clearer next time.
>
> 	-Sean
>


I was always considering stuck reviews as reviews where 2 or more cores 
were disagreeing between themselves so that it was needing a debate 
discussion during the meeting.

If we're only saying that 'stuck' means a review which hasn't been 
reviewed since a certain amount of time, then we will be having lots of 
people jumping in to ask for a review, so it would be counterproductive.

-Sylvain