Open Stack

Hey,

So one thing we need to consider there is that currently 3 options we
support (binary+souce centos and source ubuntu) basically behaves the
same way - it install current master (or last nights master, which is
close enough). This one will have fundamentally different behavior,
and we need to make that clear. This might be documentation issue, but
I feel we need to make sure that it's there.

Cheers,
inc0

On 28 December 2015 at 10:16, Steven Dake (stdake) <stdake at cisco.com> wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I have received significant feedback that the lack of Ubuntu binary support
> is a problem for Kolla adoption.  Still, we had nobody to do the work, so we
> held off approving the blueprint.  There were other reasons such as:
>
> There is no delorean style repository for debian meaning we would always be
> installing Liberty with our Mitaka tree
> Given the first problem, a gate may not be feasible – a voting gate would
> never be feasible
>
>
> Still, I think on balance, the pain here is worth the gain.  We could just
> state we wont block any activity on the Debian binary release (this includes
> tagging, releasing, etc) and mark it as "technical preview" until we sort
> out the Liberty->Mitaka port in the stable branch.  I'd like other core
> reviewers thoughts?  I really really want this feature, even if tis tech
> preview and marked with all kinds of warnings.  Without it Kolla is
> incomplete.
>
> This review is terrible (it needs to be broken up into separate patches) but
> its a huge step in the right direction IMO :)
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/260069/2
>
> Comments and thoughts welcome.
>
> Regards
> -stevve
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>