+1. I've already proposed a patch to remove it from instack-undercloud since the last report I got said it doesn't work anyway. On 12/22/2015 05:38 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > Hi all, > > I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider > input. As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work > going into Tuskar and it isn't being tested with CI. This means the code > is becoming more stale quickly and likely wont work soon (if not already). > > TripleO common is working towards solving the same problems that Tuskar > attempted and can be seen as the replacement for Tuskar. [1][2] > > Are there any objections to it's removal? This would include the tuskar, > python-tuskarclient and tuskar-ui repos. We would also need to remove it > from instack-undercloud and tripleo-image-elements. > > I'll start to beginning the cleanup process sometime in min/late January > if there are no objections. > > Cheers, > Dougal > > > [1]: > https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/mitaka/tripleo-overcloud-deployment-library.html > [2]: https://review.openstack.org/230432 > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >