[openstack-dev] [ThirdParty][CI] [patch] Status page at http://ci-watch.tintri.com/project
Mikhail Medvedev
mihailmed at gmail.com
Mon Dec 21 17:22:53 UTC 2015
On Dec 21, 2015 10:19 AM, "Asselin, Ramy" <ramy.asselin at hpe.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Phillip,
>
> Yes, please offer a patch to that repo Anita suggested. There's a small
group of us actively working on improving the code and eventually getting
ci-watch deployed in openstack.org. Your patch and help would be very much
appreciated.
+1
>
> We also meet bi-weekly in the 3rd party ci working group:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
> We also discuss some issues in #openstack-third-party-ci
>
> Thanks!
> Ramy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info]
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 6:52 AM
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ThirdParty][CI] [patch] Status page at
http://ci-watch.tintri.com/project
>
> On 12/21/2015 09:20 AM, Philipp Marek wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I quite like the page at http://ci-watch.tintri.com/project - it gives
> > a very quick overview about the failures one should look into, and
> > which to ignore ;)
> >
> >
> > Please let me state before anything else that I don't know any of the
> > restrictions that may have led into the current design - it's very
> > likely that I'm just missing a few points, and that some or all of my
> > comments below are invalid anyway. As always, take enough salt!
> >
> >
> > One thing about that page that is bothering me is the performance...
> > my
> > (current) Firefox asks me several times whether I'd like to stop the
> > JS, or whether it should be allowed to continue.
> >
> > With this patch (and a local exported copy of the page) I don't get
> > asked about that any more; it seems to give me a speedup of ~200, as
> > no intermediate lists need to be built and filtered any more:
> >
> > $ diff -u verified.js.orig verified.js
> > --- verified.js.orig 2015-12-21 15:03:45.614529924 +0100
> > +++ verified.js 2015-12-21 15:03:36.114432601 +0100
> > @@ -33,9 +33,9 @@
> > $(document).ready(function () {
> > $("colgroup").each(function (i, elem) {
> > if ($(elem).hasClass("verified-1")) {
> > - $("#results").find("td").filter(":nth-child(" + (i + 1) +
")").addClass("verified-1");
> > + $("#results td:nth-child(" + (i + 1) +
> > + ")").addClass("verified-1");
> > } else if ($(elem).hasClass("verified1")) {
> > - $("#results").find("td").filter(":nth-child(" + (i + 1) +
")").addClass("verified1");
> > + $("#results td:nth-child(" + (i + 1) +
> > + ")").addClass("verified1");
> > }
> > });
> > $("#verified1-button").on("click", toggle_verified_plus);
> >
> >
> > Furthermore, I'm wondering whether
> >
> > <td class="result verified1">
> > <a href="...">
> > <p class="success"><span class="glyphicon
glyphicon-ok"></span></p>
> > </a>
> > </td>
> >
> > couldn't be simplified to
> >
> > <td class="">
> > <a href="..." data-success="1">
> > </a>
> > </td>
> >
> > with the rest being done via CSS? Perhaps a <p></p> would be needed
> > within the <a> to get the vertical size right, but everything else
> > should be possible via CSS, I believe.
> >
> > This change should reduce the size of the generated HTML big some 50%
> > or so, too.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for listening - if you disagree, please ignore and continue
> > working on something else ;)
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> > OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> The repo is here if you would like to offer your patch via Gerrit.
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/ciwatch/
>
> Thanks Philipp,
> Anita.
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151221/447862c5/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list