Open Stack

Hi AFEK,


Sorry I was busy in other things and didn't pay much attention to Vitrage project(But I will do :) ), the notification message I metioned doesn't mean the notification based on "alarm_actions". currently, when a alarm's state changed, it will trigger the alarm actions specified in alarm definition, and also send a notification message about the alarm change to notification.info (default config value) meanwhile.


thanks
Liu sheng

At 2015-12-03 00:31:05, "AFEK, Ifat (Ifat)" <ifat.afek at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>In Vitrage[3] project, we would like to be notified on every alarm that is triggered, and respond immediately (e.g. by generating RCA insights, or by triggering new alarms on other resources). We are now in the process of designing our integration with AODH.
>
>If I understood you correctly, you want to remove the notifications to the bus, but keep the alarm_actions in the alarm definition? 
>I'd be happy to get some more details about the difference between these two approaches, and why do you think the notifications should be removed.
>
>[3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Vitrage
>
>Thanks,
>Ifat.
>
>
>>
>> From: liusheng [mailto:liusheng1175 at 126.com] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 4:32 AM
>> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][aodh] The purpose of notification about alarm updating
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Currently, a notification message will be emitted when updating an alarm (state  transition, attribute updating, creation),  this > functionality was added by change[1], but the change didn't describe any purpose. So I wonder whether there is any usage of this 
>> type of notification, we can get the whole details about alarm change by alarm-history API.  the notification is implicitly 
>> ignored by default, because the "notification_driver" config option won't be configured by default.  if we enable this option in 
>> aodh.conf and enable the "store_events" in ceilometer.conf, this type of notifications will be stored as events. so maybe some 
>> users want to aggregate this with events ? what's your opinion ?
>>
>> I have made a change try to deprecate this notification, see [2].
>>
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48949/
>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/246727/
>>
>> BR
>> Liu sheng
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151216/9433f125/attachment.html>