Open Stack

Hi Flavio,

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> Oh, I meant ocasionally. Whenever a missing test for an API is found,
> it'd be easy enough for the implementer to sohw up at the meeting and
> bring it up.

>From my experience as a Tempest reviewer, I'd say that most newly added
tests are *not* submitted by Tempest regular contributors. I assume
(wrongly ?) that it's mostly people from the actual projects (e.g glance)
who are interested in adding new Tempest tests to test a feature recently
implemented. Put differently, I don't think it's part of Tempest core
team/community to add new tests. We mostly provide a framework and guidance
these days.

But, reading this thread, I don"t know what to suggest. As a Tempest
reviewer I won't start a new ML thread or send a message to a PTL each time
I see a new test being added...I assume the patch author to know what he is
doing, I can't keep on with what's going on in each and every project.
Also, a test can be quickly removed if it is latter on deemed not so useful.

Jordan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151208/50b8c337/attachment.html>