Open Stack

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Jan Hilberath <jan at midokura.com> wrote:
> On 2015年12月01日 19:14, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon
>> <toni+openstackml at midokura.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Ivan Kelly <ivan at midokura.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1 for #2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PS: Beware of the top-posting! It makes vote counting harder ;-)
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Sandro Mathys <sandro at midokura.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Our IRC channels have been neglected for a long time, and as a result
>>>>> we lost ownership of #midonet-dev, which is now owner by
>>>>> freenode-staff. In theory, it should be very easy to get ownership
>>>>> back, particularly since we still own #midonet. But in reality, it
>>>>> seems like none of the freenode staff feel responsible for these
>>>>> requests, so we still aren't owners after requesting it for 3 weeks
>>>>> already.
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore, Toni Segura suggested we just ditch it and move to
>>>>> #openstack-midonet instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, several people have also said we don't need two channels,
>>>>> i.e. we should merge #midonet and #midonet-dev.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, here's three proposals:
>>>>>
>>>>> Proposal #1:
>>>>> * keep #midonet
>>>>> * replace #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet
>>>>>
>>>>> Proposal #2:
>>>>> * keep #midonet
>>>>> * merge #midonet-dev into #midonet
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>>
>> +1
>
>
> +1

Alright, we'll go with #midonet then. I've now configured #midonet-dev
so, that anyone who tries to join it is instead forwarded to #midonet.
I've also set up the same for #openstack-midonet, just in case someone
is looking for us there.

I've also archived all developers' channels on Slack with a note that
we moved to IRC.

Cheers,
Sandro

>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Proposal #3:
>>>>> * replace both #midonet and #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have any strong feelings for any of the proposals, but suggest
>>>>> we go with proposal #2. Traffic in both #midonet and #midonet-dev is
>>>>> rather low, so one channel should do - there's way busier OpenStack
>>>>> channels out there. Furthermore, #midonet is shorter than
>>>>> #openstack-midonet and already established. I also think people will
>>>>> rather look in #midonet than #openstack-midonet if they're looking for
>>>>> us.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Sandro
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev