Open Stack

Thanks Yamamoto. Yes, agree it makes sense to keep it in the TaaS tree.
Would be great though to have broader audience come and review it.

Seems like there is not much activity. I can go ahead and take a stab at
reviving it [1] and then we can iterate over and improve.

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96149/

Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq


On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamamoto at midokura.com>
wrote:

> hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Fawad Khaliq <fawad at plumgrid.com> wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Any plan to revive this [1] so we can discuss and finalize the use cases
> and
> > APIs.
> >
> > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96149/
>
> i think Anil will explain the history of the project.
>
> i suspect neutron-spec isn't appropriate place for us anymore.
> we can have subproject spec as other projects have.  [2]
>
> [2] eg. https://github.com/openstack/networking-midonet/tree/master/specs
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Fawad Khaliq
> >
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151203/5b3c82b3/attachment.html>