Open Stack

FYI: the process is in effect now.

Please submit specs to https://github.com/openstack/ironic-inspector-specs/
Approved specs will appear on 
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-inspector-specs/

On 11/19/2015 02:19 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> I've been dodging subj for some time (mostly due to my laziness), but
> now it seems like the time has come. We're discussing 2 big features:
> autodiscovery and HA that I would like us to have a proper consensus on.
>
> I'd like to get your opinion on one of the options:
> 1. Do not have specs, only blueprints are enough for us.
> 2. Reuse ironic-specs repo, create our own subdirectory with our own
> template
> 3. Create a new ironic-inspector-specs repo.
>
> I vote for #2, as sharing a repo with the remaining ironic would
> increase visibility of large inspector changes (i.e. those deserving a
> spec). We would probably use [inspector] tag in the commit summary, so
> that people explicitly NOT wanting to review them can quickly ignore.
>
> Also note that I still see #1 (use only blueprints) as a way to go for
> simple features.
>
> WDYT?
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev