Open Stack

hi,

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Sandro Mathys <sandro at midokura.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Trying to prepare moving our repos to the OpenStack infrastructure, I
> got reminded just how many repos we have in our GitHub organization
> [1] - and how many of those seem to be deprecated or tangential.
>
> Now, do we still want to migrate them? Pretty sure the answer is "no"
> for the deprecated ones but I wonder about the tangential ones. Well,
> to be honest, I also wonder which are actually deprecated/tangential
> and which are considered "important".
>
> First of all, I think repos that are not set up on GerritHub, don't
> need to be migrated. Partially because they don't seem important
> enough, and partially because migration would force Gerrit upon them
> (i.e. Gerrit is the main repo for a project in OpenStack, the others
> are just mirrors). But the list of midonet repos on GerritHub [2] is
> still very long.
>
> Of those, I figure these are deprecated and shouldn't be migrated:
> * arrakis
> * midostack
>
> Also, I'm only looking at what repos to migrate under the "midonet"
> umbrella. These repos should probably be migrated under a different
> umbrella, if at all:
> * ansible-* (-> ansible-openstack)
> * puppet-* (-> puppet-openstack)
> * zephyr (-> zephyr)
>
> Furthermore, these seem to be forks that should (no longer) see
> downstream commits, right?
> * python-midonetclient

this is a mirror of a part of midonet tree.

i tend to think it should be its own project.
but it's probably a separate discussion.

> * python-neutronclient

this seems like a fork to add a few cli sub commands.
if it is, it should be re-implemented in networking-midonet repo.
joe, do you have any idea?

>
> Last but not least, we have repos that have only a single contributor
> and should probably not be part of the midonet organization anyway -
> and repos with (virtually) no commits:
> * bees
> * docker-openvpn-client
> * docker-zk-web
> * orizuru
> * toscana
> * ubuntu-integration
>
> Alright, this leaves us with 11 repos - much better number!
>
> These, I think we should migrate:
> * mdts
> * midonet
> * midonet-docs
> * midonet-sandbox
>
> These, we could migrate but they are low priority and might actually
> go away so let's defer:
> * midonethomepage
> * planet-midonet
>
> However, I have no idea about these - are they still needed? Do they
> belong under the midonet umbrella?
> * jmx_exporter
> * midonet-charms
> * midonet-dockerfile
> * tempest-add

this is additional tempest scenarios.  no need to move.

> * zktimemachine
>
> Please share your thoughts - did I exclude some that should be
> included in the migration? Should some be included that are not
> currently configured on GerritHub? And what about those 5 repos in the
> last list?
>
> Note, that all repos we want to migrate under the midonet umbrella
> probably need to have a "midonet-" in front, so it would need to be
> added to those who don't have it. (Well, planet-midonet will become
> midonet-planet and midonethomepage gain a dash).
>
> Thanks,
> Sandro
>
> PS. the "when" and "how" will be discussed later - let's focus on the
> "what" in this thread, please.
>
> [1] https://github.com/midonet
> [2] https://review.gerrithub.io/#/admin/projects/?filter=midonet%252F
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev