Open Stack

Hongbin,

We are hearing the best advice available from the folks who started the
library, evangelized it across nova, ironic, heat, neutron etc.

If we can spend so much time and energy (*FOUR* -1's on a review which just
changes some commented lines - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211057/)
then we can and should clearly do better in things that really matter in
the long run.

If we get into the rhythm of doing the right things and figuring out the
steps needed right from the get go, it will pay off in the future.

My 2 cents.

Thanks,
Dims

PS: Note that i used "we" wearing my magnum core hat and not the o.vo/oslo
core hat :)

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Dan Smith <dms at danplanet.com> wrote:

> > If you want my inexperienced opinion, a young project is the perfect
> > time to start this.
>
>         ^--- This ---^
>
> > I understand that something like [2] will cause a test to fail when you
> > make a major change to a versioned object. But you *want* that. It helps
> > reviewers more easily catch contributors to say "You need to update the
> > version, because the hash changed". The sooner you start using versioned
> > objects in the way they are designed, the smaller the upfront cost, and
> > it will also be a major savings later on if something like [1] pops up.
>
> ...and the way it will be the least overhead is if it's part of the
> culture of contributors and reviewers. It's infinitely harder to take
> the culture shift after everyone is used to not having to think about
> upgrades, not to mention the technical recovery Ryan mentioned.
>
> It's not my call for Magnum, but long-term thinking definitely pays off
> in this particular area.
>
> --Dan
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150828/99e7a8f6/attachment.html>