On August 22, 2015 11:58:03 AM EDT, Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com> wrote: >On 08/21/2015 03:33 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: >> On 08/21/2015 02:34 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote: >>> So - the tl;dr is that I don't think that we should accept inputs >like >>> the following: >>> >>> x -> 192 >>> x/y -> 10/8 >>> x.x/y -> 192.168/16 >>> x.x.x/y -> 192.168.0/24 >>> >>> which are equivalent to:: >>> >>> x.0.0.0/y -> 192.0.0.0/24 >>> x.0.0.0/y -> 10.0.0.0/8 >>> x.x.0.0/y -> 192.168.0.0/16 >>> x.x.x.0/y -> 192.168.0.0/24 >> >> Agreed completely. > >++ > > >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: >OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev I've got a proof of concept patch for netaddr, I'll be reaching out to the netaddr devs and use it to spur discussion. https://github.com/sc68cal/netaddr/commit/7ccbfe40fe6be66228601977ded74781cf5cffd9 -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150822/5d6c6e9e/attachment.html>