[openstack-dev] [cinder] Brocade CI

Angela Smith aallen at Brocade.COM
Fri Aug 21 20:01:54 UTC 2015


Mike,
I wanted to update you on our progress on the Brocade CI.
We are currently working on the remaining requirements of adding recheck and adding link to wiki page for a failed result.
Also, the CI is now consistently testing and reporting on all cinder reviews for the past 3 days.
Thanks,
Angela

From: Nagendra Jaladanki [mailto:nagendra.jaladanki at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 4:59 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: DL-GRP-ENG-Brocade-Openstack-CI
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Brocade CI

Ramy,
Thanks for providing the correct message. We will update our commit message accordingly.
Thanks,
Nagendra Rao

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Asselin, Ramy <ramy.asselin at hp.com<mailto:ramy.asselin at hp.com>> wrote:
Hi Nagendra,

Seems one of the issues is the format of the posted comments. The correct format is documented here [1]

Notice the format is not correct:
Incorrect: Brocade Openstack CI (non-voting) build SUCCESS logs at: http://144.49.208.28:8000/build_logs/2015-08-13_18-19-19/
Correct: * test-name-no-spaces http://link.to/result : [SUCCESS|FAILURE] some comment about the test

Ramy

[1] http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html#posting-result-to-gerrit

From: Nagendra Jaladanki [mailto:nagendra.jaladanki at gmail.com<mailto:nagendra.jaladanki at gmail.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 4:37 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Cc: Brocade-Openstack-CI at brocade.com<mailto:Brocade-Openstack-CI at brocade.com>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Brocade CI

Mike,

Thanks for your feedback and suggestions. I had send my response yesterday but looks like didn't get posted on the lists.openstack.org<http://lists.openstack.org>. Hence posting it here again.

We reviewed your comments and following issues were identified and some of them are fixed and some fix plans in progress:

1) Not posting success or failure
 The Brocade CI is a non-voting CI. The CI is posting the comment for build sucucess or failures. The report tool is not seeing these. We are working on correcting this.
2) Not posting a result link to view logs.
   We could not find any cases where CI is failed to post the link to logs from the generated report.  If you have any specific uses where it failed to post logs link, please share with us. But we did see that CI not posted the comment at all for some review patch sets. Root causing the issue why CI not posted the comment at all.
3) Not consistently doing runs.
   There were planned down times and CI not posted during those periods. We also observed that CI was not posting the failures in some cases where CI failed due non openstack issues. We corrected this. Now the CI should be posting the results for all patch sets either success or failure.
We are also doing the following:
- Enhance the message format to be inline with other CIs.
- Closely monitoring the incoming Jenkin's request vs out going builds and correcting if there are any issues.

Once again thanks for your feedback and suggestions. We will continue to post this list on the updates.

Thanks & Regards,

Nagendra Rao Jaladanki

Manager, Software Engineering Manageability Brocade

130 Holger Way, San Jose, CA 95134

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Mike Perez <thingee at gmail.com<mailto:thingee at gmail.com>> wrote:
People have asked me at the Cinder midcycle sprint to look at the Brocade CI
to:

1) Keep the zone manager driver in Liberty.
2) Consider approving additional specs that we're submitted before the
   deadline.

Here are the current problems with the last 100 runs [1]:

1) Not posting success or failure.
2) Not posting a result link to view logs.
3) Not consistently doing runs. If you compare with other CI's there are plenty
   missing in a day.

This CI does not follow the guidelines [2]. Please get help [3].

[1] - http://paste.openstack.org/show/412316/
[2] - http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html#requirements
[3] - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#Questions

--
Mike Perez

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150821/9d737a64/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list