Open Stack

On 08/19/2015 06:42 PM, Derek Higgins wrote:
> On 06/08/15 15:01, Dougal Matthews wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Dan Prince" <dprince at redhat.com>
>>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, 6 August, 2015 1:12:42 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream
>
> <snip>
>
>>> I would really like to see us rename python-rdomanager-oscplugin. I
>>> think any project having the name "RDO" in it probably doesn't belong
>>> under TripleO proper. Looking at the project there are some distro
>>> specific things... but those are fairly encapsulated (or could be made
>>> so fairly easily).
>>
>> I agree, it made sense as it was the entrypoint to RDO-Manager. However,
>> it could easily be called the python-tripleo-oscplugin or similar. The
>> changes would be really trivial, I can only think of one area that
>> may be distro specific.
>
> I'm putting the commit together now to pull these repositories into
> upstream tripleo are we happy with the name "python-tripleo-oscplugin" ?

Do we really need this "oscplugin" postfix? It may be clear for some of 
us, but I don't that our users know that OSC means OpenStackClient, and 
that oscplugin designates "something that adds features to openstack 
command". Can't we just call it python-tripleo? or maybe even just 
"tripleo"?

>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev