Open Stack

Hi Tim

We use fixed count of columns. So I believe there should not be any bad 
impact of this change.

Regards
Filip

On 08/18/2015 11:22 PM, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're contemplating a small syntax change in the Congress policy 
> language and wanted to see if it would cause anyone problems.
>
> Currently you can write rules that give a single table differing 
> numbers of columns.  In the following example, the 'error' table has 
> both 1 column and 2 columns.
>
> error(vm) :- blah blah
> error(vm, net) :- blah blah
>
> We're contemplating removing this flexibility and making every table 
> have a fixed number of columns.  (We only support differing numbers of 
> columns in very special cases anyway.)
>
> Would this cause any problems?  Murano team?
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150819/a279fd57/attachment.html>