Open Stack

Hi all,
what is the current status of the feature in terms of readiness for
production use? I'm wondering as I see a number of bugs, and so we might
want to still have it in experimental mode for 7.0, and enable in 8.0.

These are the bugs I came across:
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1485188
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1481721
[3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1482242
[4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1483188
[5] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1485188

QA team - what is your point of view? Do you see that it's converging to
working solution with high level of confidence or not?
Some of the bugs seem to be blocking easy scale testing [1,2,4,5]. If it's
the case, then I would rather revert back to CentOS-default: we can't block
testing at this stage in the release timeline.

Thanks,

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:03 AM Lukasz Oles <loles at mirantis.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Alexei Sheplyakov
> <asheplyakov at mirantis.com> wrote:
> > Lukasz,
> >
> >> As I see, unfortunatly script which you recommend to use does not use
> this
> >> paths.
> >> Instead it have hardcoded values.
> >
> > Actually the script does use the values from the config file
> > (/etc/fuel-bootstrap-image.conf) generated by fuelmenu.
> Ah, I missed it. Thx
>
> >> Now we need to update paths in two places. Why is that?
> >
> > There are fallback settings in the script so it can work without
> > fuelmenu/config file.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >       Alexei
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Lukasz Oles <loles at mirantis.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> there is some inconsistency here. Currently I'm fixing bug[1] in
> >> fuelmemu. In my fix[2] I changed paths to repos. As I see,
> >> unfortunatly script which you recommend to use does not use this
> >> paths. Instead it have hardcoded values.
> >> Now we need to update paths in two places. Why is that?
> >>
> >> 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1484648
> >> 2. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213090/
> >> 3.
> >>
> https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-main/blob/master/fuel-bootstrap-image-builder/bin/fuel-bootstrap-image#L14
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Mikhail Semenov <msemenov at mirantis.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > We have new feature in the upcoming release MOS 7.0 - Ubuntu-based
> >> > bootstrap
> >> > in addition to current CentOS-based one. Design spec can be found
> here.
> >> >
> >> > Current 7.0 ISO contains 2 bootstrap images: CentOS-based (default)
> and
> >> > Ubuntu-based. You can easily switch to Ubuntu-based bootstrap using
> this
> >> > steps:
> >> > 1. Make sure the master node can access Ubuntu
> >> > (http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu) and MOS
> >> > (http://mirror.fuel-infra.org/mos-repos) APT repositories.
> >> > 2. Run the following command on the master node:
> >> > fuel-bootstrap-image-set ubuntu
> >> > 3. Just in a case restart dnsmasq:
> >> > dockerctl shell cobbler service dnsmasq restart
> >> > 4. Reboot the slave nodes.
> >> >
> >> > There are only 2 weeks left for testing. On 08/27 we will make a
> >> > decision
> >> > about using Ubuntu bootstrap by default in MOS 7.0. It depends on the
> >> > test
> >> > results and statistics(more deployments - more confidence).
> >> >
> >> > I want to ask everyone to try new Ubuntu bootstrap. Please, deploy it
> on
> >> > your environments and file bugs in case of failures. It's most
> important
> >> > for
> >> > partners and plugin developers. Feel free to contact Alexei
> >> > Sheplyakov(feature lead) and me in case of questions.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Michael
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> > Unsubscribe:
> >> > OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Łukasz Oleś
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Łukasz Oleś
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-- 
Mike Scherbakov
#mihgen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150817/2dd5ec6b/attachment.html>