Open Stack

Hi feisky,

I think thats a great question, not because of port-mapping in particular
:) but because
we need to think on a feature by feature basis and map all the features the
dockers API allow which
we cannot support directly with Neutron API or its services sub-projects
API.
(apuimedo, maybe we need to set this as a future task for us)

But we also need to understand the use cases for supporting these API's so
we can address them
and give them priorities (and this is something we as a community need to
decide how to handle).

For your question, given that we have network isolation and security from
neutron API's and given
we have NAT support (by Neutron API and the plugins implementing the
network) , what do you see as a use case to use the port-mapping ?

I welcome you and everyone else to raise and describe these use cases so
the Neutron/Kuryr community can think
how to solve and help, and if needed also adjust or add extensions for
support.

Thanks
Gal.


On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:28 AM, feisky <feiskyer at gmail.com> wrote:

> Will Kuryr supports docker's port-mapping?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://openstack.10931.n7.nabble.com/neutron-kuryr-magnum-Design-Specification-for-Kuryr-tp82256p82299.html
> Sent from the Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Best Regards ,

The G.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150814/1aeeecb1/attachment.html>