[openstack-dev] [third-party][infra] Third-Party CI Operators: Let's use a common CI Solution!

Kurt Taylor kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com
Tue Apr 21 18:11:29 UTC 2015


On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Lenny Verkhovsky <lennyb at mellanox.com>
wrote:

>  Hi Ramy,
>
> Will there be any discussions of this issue on the Vancouver Summit?
>

See previous email in this thread, I have proposed a cross-project session
to discuss third party CI topics.


>
>
> *Lenny Verkhovsky*
>
> SW Engineer,  Mellanox Technologies
>
>
>
> *From:* Nikolay Fedotov (nfedotov) [mailto:nfedotov at cisco.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 21, 2015 8:10 PM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party][infra] Third-Party CI
> Operators: Let's use a common CI Solution!
>
>
>
> Hello Ramy
>
>
>
> Take me in account J
>
> We used puppet modules located in system-config to install zuul and
> nodepool. Also there were a lot manual configuration.
>
> Maybe someday  there will be a “green button” to set it up in moment.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> *From:* Asselin, Ramy [mailto:ramy.asselin at hp.com <ramy.asselin at hp.com>]
> *Sent:* Monday, April 20, 2015 8:17 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [third-party][infra] Third-Party CI Operators:
> Let's use a common CI Solution!
>
>
>
> All Third-Party CI operators:
>
>
>
> We’ve got 85 Third Party CI systems registered in the wiki[1], all of them
> running a variety of closed & open-source solutions.
>
> Instead of individually maintaining all those similar solutions, let’s
> join together and collectively maintain a single solution.
>
>
>
> If that sounds good to you, there’s an Infra-spec that’s been approved [2]
> to refactor much of what the Infrastructure team uses for the upstream
> “Jenkins” CI to be more easily reusable by many of us.
>
>
>
> We’ve got stories defined [3], and a few patches submitted. We’re using
> the gerrit-topic “downstream-puppet” [4].
>
>
>
> For example, we’ve got the first part under review for the “Log Server”,
> which creates your own version of http://logs.openstack.org/
>
>
>
> If anyone is interested in migrating towards a common solution, reply, or
> ping me IRC (asselin) on Freenode #openstack-infra, or join some of the
> third party ci meetings [5].
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ramy
>
>
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems
>
> [2]
> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/specs/openstackci.html
>
> [3] https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2000101
>
> [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:downstream-puppet,n,z
>
> [5]
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty#Weekly_Third_Party_meetings
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150421/0427d1af/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list