Open Stack

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:33 PM, x Lyn <xuanlangjian at gmail.com> wrote:

> Since cloudwatch is deprecated, is there any plan to remove it away from
> codes? Or still has some functions depend on this service?
>

No plans as yet, but all you have to do is not run the binary (heat-api-cw).


>
> 2015-04-18 2:29 GMT+08:00 Zane Bitter <zbitter at redhat.com>:
>
>> On 17/04/15 13:54, Matt Fischer wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Zane Bitter <zbitter at redhat.com
>>> <mailto:zbitter at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     On 17/04/15 12:46, Matt Fischer wrote:
>>>
>>>         The wiki for Using Cloudwatch states:
>>>
>>>         "This feature will be deprecated or removed during the Havana
>>>         cycle as
>>>         we move to using Ceilometer as a metric/alarm service instead."
>>> [1]
>>>
>>>         However it seems that cloudwatch is still being developed.
>>>
>>>
>>>     It doesn't seem that way to me, and without at least some kind of
>>>     hint I'm not in a position to speculate on why it might seem that
>>>     way to you.
>>>
>>>         So is it deprecated or not?
>>>
>>>
>>>     Yes, it's very deprecated.
>>>
>>>     In fact, we should go ahead and disable it in the default config.
>>>
>>>     - ZB
>>>
>>>
>>> I was just looking at the dates in the commit log for the cloudwatch
>>> folder and seeing things from 2015. If it's truly deprecated, that's
>>> great, I'll remove it from my environment.
>>>
>>
>> OK, that's what I looked at too, and there were a lot of recent changes
>> but they all appeared to be global cleanups that went across the whole Heat
>> codebase. The last thing that looked like active development was in July
>> 2013. You definitely won't regret removing it ;)
>>
>>
So before we get too excited, ceilometer AFAIK does not have a native guest
client that doesn't use a token.
ATM heat-api-cw bounces metrics to ceilometer that were associated with
ceilometer alarms.

-Angus


> cheers,
>> Zane.
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150421/f7095ddc/attachment.html>