Open Stack

On 04/08/2015 10:42 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org
> <mailto:thierry at openstack.org>> wrote:
> 
>     The question is, how should we proceed there ? This is new procedure, so
>     I'm a bit unclear on the best way forward and would like to pick our
>     collective brain. Should we just push requirements cap for all OpenStack
>     libs and create stable branches from the last tagged release everywhere
>     ? What about other libraries ? Should we push a cap there too ? Should
>     we just ignore the whole thing for the Kilo release for all non-Oslo
>     stuff ?
> 
> 
> Provided that represents the code being used for testing at this point,
> and I believe it does, this seems like a sensible default action.  Next
> cycle we can make a bit more noise about when this default action will
> occur, probably pick one of the other existing dates late in the cycle
> such as RC or string freeze or whatever. (Maybe that already happened
> and I can't remember?)

Yes, due to the way we're testing client libraries, that's the right
approach. In future we should fully cap GR as the first Milestone 3
task. And everything after that should be managed as an exception to get
bumps.

>     All other non-Oslo libs in the OpenStack world do not seem to be
>     directly consumed by projects that have stable branches, and are
>     therefore likely to not maintain stable branches. Please report any
>     glaring omission there.
> 
> 
> OSC is not used by any of the integrated release projects but due to its
> dependencies on the other client libs and use in DevStack I would like
> to follow the same process for it here.  The current 1.0.3 release is
> the one that should be used for stable.

Agreed.

	-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net