Open Stack

On 4/3/15, 8:24 PM, "Dugger, Donald D" <donald.d.dugger at intel.com> wrote:

>The goal is not `splitting for the sake of splitting'.  The goal is to
>have a separate scheduler that is ultimately usable by other projects
>inside OpenStack.  Currently Cinder has its own filter based scheduler
>(duplicating scheduling code in 2 places seems silly), Neutron will need
>scheduling services, there are multiple places where a common scheduling
>service would be beneficial.

+ 1
>
>--
>Don Dugger
>"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
>Ph: 303/443-3786
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ed Leafe [mailto:ed at leafe.com]
>Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 10:59 AM
>To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using
>"Gantt" for discussing about Nova scheduler
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA512
>
>On 04/03/2015 11:42 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
>
>> Yes the current effort is to clean up the scheduler interfaces but one
>> of the main goals of that clean up is to make it possible to then
>> split out the scheduler to a separate project.  I don't want to lose
>> focus on the ultimate goal of creating the split.
>
>I don't agree that the ultimate goal is splitting the scheduler. IMO, the
>goal is to create 1) a clean, robust interface along with 2) a scalable
>architecture. Those improvements will 1) allow the scheduler to be split
>cleanly, and 2) justify splitting it out. Splitting for the sake of
>splitting is pointless.
>
>- -- 
>
>- -- Ed Leafe
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v2
>Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
>iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVHsbeAAoJEKMgtcocwZqLdysQAIJ6nThjqgNgJu1hLW4n6MDY
>Db57k+37b5M5h6Z633jrXSTWCuqjIwUIW2G1+PQMsXq7FcWguAG7fxhVizE4s0h0
>RhucmNQ1GWj6eFNfpSljC0WAdZEDhuXnPcxi2OyMwRr0j2lqYcJvPKBmuobS8Rbl
>xD9ciIlVELtHPm2dsj1HkB8TO7fgESjdv+I2QPU9C31ubp0CYlwSAPCdAhN9g+B0
>WVCEnq+7ADn95G+/z77Wlx6s83KkCh89C+h2ivgGI4mHeWJskXT9lr9lsC342DO9
>GoWvDvRF5H9/imx6Jh4avipH55YCZfZ9T+2eOPVoAYkXujPiX13tqM8UkBj7KCDx
>/FJNatC0aTDPYGMgOW329pGWkP9n2ceW1gMlyHpmMFJHCaAdmM+gqnjnarT1UECr
>13yndy9axjubisZ71hdGgBi/Sy1FbG5+XVshWyAUgzoJZurDtg4RhhUdw8n0iQKd
>SuA3E9Z+PI6gTulp532JdHBVOpsG2P+9QOzLwBEnpSp8WmuU8h2EVMm6A3Zdrf+4
>zIUL8lvpDwZ/0KBHSF6WptZspSXe/OwOKlQYO2geHkeARANv3Tv/h3HB/7SW1Bz0
>8N5K2aDK/adzfzagrV0S3f201JoFC90JSXgA4dDdtHr8/oUj1kw3QoTACVrvPvYP
>ayW76hfM68cjJ3DyhXys
>=5h63
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev