[openstack-dev] [Ceph] Why performance of benchmarks with small blocks is extremely small?
Pasquale Porreca
pasquale.porreca at dektech.com.au
Mon Sep 29 11:49:17 UTC 2014
Hello
I have no experience with Ceph and this specific benchmark tool, anyway
I have experience with several other performance benchmark tools and
file systems and I can say it always happen to have very very low
performance results when the file size is too small (i.e. < 1MB).
My suspect is that benchmark tools are not reliable for file size so
small, since the time to write is so small that the overhead introduced
by the test itself is not at all negligible.
I saw that the default object size for rados is 4 MB, did you try your
test without the option "-b 512"? I think the results should be
different for several order of magnitude.
BR
On 09/27/14 17:14, Timur Nurlygayanov wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I installed OpenStack with Glance + Ceph OSD with replication factor 2
> and now I can see the write operations are extremly slow.
> For example, I can see only 0.04 MB/s write speed when I run rados
> bench with 512b blocks:
>
> rados bench -p test 60 write --no-cleanup -t 1 -b 512
>
> Maintaining 1 concurrent writes of 512 bytes for up to 60 seconds or
> 0 objects
> Object prefix: benchmark_data_node-17.domain.tld_15862
> sec Cur ops started finished avg MB/s cur MB/s last
> lat avg lat
> 0 0 0 0 0
> 0 - 0
> 1 1 83 82 0.0400341 0.0400391
> 0.008465 0.0120985
> 2 1 169 168 0.0410111 0.0419922
> 0.080433 0.0118995
> 3 1 240 239 0.0388959 0.034668
> 0.008052 0.0125385
> 4 1 356 355 0.0433309 0.0566406
> 0.00837 0.0112662
> 5 1 472 471 0.0459919 0.0566406
> 0.008343 0.0106034
> 6 1 550 549 0.0446735 0.0380859
> 0.036639 0.0108791
> 7 1 581 580 0.0404538 0.0151367
> 0.008614 0.0120654
>
>
> My test environment configuration:
> Hardware servers with 1Gb network interfaces, 64Gb RAM and 16 CPU
> cores per node, HDDs WDC WD5003ABYX-01WERA0.
> OpenStack with 1 controller, 1 compute and 2 ceph nodes (ceph on
> separate nodes).
> CentOS 6.5, kernel 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64.
>
> I tested several config options for optimizations, like in
> /etc/ceph/ceph.conf:
>
> [default]
> ...
> osd_pool_default_pg_num = 1024
> osd_pool_default_pgp_num = 1024
> osd_pool_default_flag_hashpspool = true
> ...
> [osd]
> osd recovery max active = 1
> osd max backfills = 1
> filestore max sync interval = 30
> filestore min sync interval = 29
> filestore flusher = false
> filestore queue max ops = 10000
> filestore op threads = 16
> osd op threads = 16
> ...
> [client]
> rbd_cache = true
> rbd_cache_writethrough_until_flush = true
>
> and in /etc/cinder/cinder.conf:
>
> [DEFAULT]
> volume_tmp_dir=/tmp
>
> but in the result performance was increased only on ~30 % and it not
> looks like huge success.
>
> Non-default mount options and TCP optimization increase the speed in
> about 1%:
>
> [root at node-17 ~]# mount | grep ceph
> /dev/sda4 on /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-0 type xfs
> (rw,noexec,nodev,noatime,nodiratime,user_xattr,data=writeback,barrier=0)
>
> [root at node-17 ~]# cat /etc/sysctl.conf
> net.core.rmem_max = 16777216
> net.core.wmem_max = 16777216
> net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 16777216
> net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 16777216
> net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling = 1
> net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps = 1
> net.ipv4.tcp_sack = 1
>
>
> Do we have other ways to significantly improve CEPH storage performance?
> Any feedback and comments are welcome!
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> --
>
> Timur,
> QA Engineer
> OpenStack Projects
> Mirantis Inc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
00040 Pomezia (Roma)
Mobile +39 3394823805
Skype paskporr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140929/9891e750/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list