[openstack-dev] [requirements] [nova] requirements freeze exception for websockify
Sean Dague
sean at dague.net
Mon Sep 22 19:22:54 UTC 2014
On 09/22/2014 02:58 PM, Solly Ross wrote:
> The reason it was bounded was because we (the websockify upstream mantainers) made a backwards-incompatible change (for good reasons -- it brought websockify more inline with the Python standard library interfaces).
> However, OpenStack had subclassed the WebSocketProxy code, and so the change would have broken OpenStack.
>
> I did a commit a while ago that made it possible to use Nova with both the newest version and the older versions, but we never bumped the max version for OpenStack, even though we could.
Actually, the max version is bumped. We're testing with 0.6.0 in the
gate because of it.
-Sean
>
> Best Regards,
> Solly
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Doug Hellmann" <doug at doughellmann.com>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 1:54:08 PM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] [nova] requirements freeze exception for websockify
>>
>> On Sep 19, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to request a requirements freeze exception for websockify -
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/122702/
>>>
>>> The rationale for this is that websockify version bump fixes a Nova bug
>>> about zombie processes - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1048703.
>>> It also sets g-r to the value we've been testing against for the entire
>>> last cycle.
>>>
>>> I don't believe it has any impacts on other projects, so should be a
>>> very safe change.
>>
>> Gantt, Ironic, and Nova all use websockify.
>>
>> I’m +1 on updating the minimum based on the fact that our current version
>> spec is causing us to test with this version anyway.
>>
>> However, the proposed change also removes the upper bound. Do we know why
>> that was bounded before? Have we had issues with API changes in that
>> project? Is it safe to remove the cap?
>>
>> Doug
>>
>>>
>>> -Sean
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sean Dague
>>> http://dague.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list