Open Stack

Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com> wrote on 09/22/2014 12:50:43 PM:

> From: Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 09/22/2014 12:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - what integration with
> Keystone is allowed?
>
> In Keystone, as Dolph says, a tenant name is not globally unique,
> so IMHO tenant_id needs to be passed to a back-end controller
> to ensure uniqueness of tenant (or project).
>

Yes, that has been the case in this plugin (and the patch in question does
not change that).


> tenant_name can be an additional information.
> For example it can be used in a GUI of a back-end controller,
> so I think it may be useful for some purpose.
>

Exactly.


Best,

Mohammad


> Thanks,
> Akihiro
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Kevin Benton <blak111 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > A patch has come up to query keystone for tenant names in the IBM
> > plugin.[1] As I understand it, this was one of the reasons another
> > mechanism driver was reverted.[2] Can we get some clarity on the level
> > of integration with Keystone that is permitted?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/122382
> > 2. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118456
> >
> > --
> > Kevin Benton
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140922/a5fd31a7/attachment.html>