[openstack-dev] [Heat][Zaqar] Integration plan moving forward
Robert Collins
robertc at robertcollins.net
Sat Sep 20 09:45:46 UTC 2014
On 20 September 2014 17:20, Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com> wrote:
>> At least initially we'll need to do both, since not everybody has Zaqar.
>> If we can not have events at all in v2 of the API that would be
>> fantastic though :)
>
> Yeah - don't forget the folks who are deploying heat in standalone mode
> who may not have (or want) an additional event stream service thing.
They can install Zaqar in standalone mode too, if they need the
functionality. I don't see that as a good reason to keep two
implementations of basically the same thing.
-Rob
--
Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list