Open Stack

On 09/16/2014 11:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> Based on my reading of the wiki page about this it sounds like it should
> be a sub-project of the Storage program.  While it is targeted for use
> by multiple projects, it's pretty specific to interacting with Cinder,
> right?  If so, it seems like Oslo wouldn't be a good fit.  We'd just end
> up adding all of cinder-core to the project anyway. :-)

+1 I think the same arguments and conclusions we had on glance-store
make sense here. I'd probably go with having it under the Block Storage
program.

Flavio

> 
> -Ben
> 
> On 09/16/2014 12:49 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
>> Hi Stackers!
>>
>> I'm working on moving Brick out of Cinder for K release.
>>
>> There're a lot of open questions for now:
>>
>>    - Should we move it to oslo or somewhere on stackforge?
>>    - Better architecture of it to fit all Cinder and Nova requirements
>>    - etc.
>>
>> Before starting discussion, I've created some proof-of-concept to try it. I
>> moved Brick to some lib named oslo.storage for testing only. It's only one
>> of the possible solution to start work on it.
>>
>> All sources are aviable on GitHub [1], [2].
>>
>> [1] - I'm not sure that this place and name is good for it, it's just a PoC.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/e0ne/oslo.storage
>> [2] https://github.com/e0ne/cinder/tree/brick - some tests still failed.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ivan Kolodyazhny
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e0ne at e0ne.info> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All!
>>>
>>> I would to start moving Cinder Brick [1] to oslo as was described on
>>> Cinder mid-cycle meetup [2]. Unfortunately I missed meetup so I want be
>>> sure that nobody started it and we are on the same page.
>>>
>>> According to the Juno 3 release, there was not enough time to discuss [3]
>>> on the latest Cinder weekly meeting and I would like to get some feedback
>>> from the all OpenStack community, so I propose to start this discussion on
>>> mailing list for all projects.
>>>
>>> I anybody didn't started it and it is useful at least for both Nova and
>>> Cinder I would to start this work according oslo guidelines [4] and
>>> creating needed blueprints to make it finished until Kilo 1 is over.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderBrick
>>> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-meetup-summer-2014
>>> [3]
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044608.html
>>> [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/CreatingANewLibrary
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 


-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco