Open Stack

On 09/15/2014 10:21 AM, Chris St. Pierre wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange at redhat.com
> <mailto:berrange at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     To arbitrarily restrict the user is a bug.
>
>
> QFT.
>
> This is why I don't feel like a blueprint should be necessary -- this is
> a fairly simple changes that fixes what's pretty undeniably a bug. I
> also don't see much consensus on whether or not I need to go through the
> interminable blueprint process to get this accepted.
>
> So since everyone seems to think that this is at least not a bad idea,
> and since no one seems to know why it was originally changed,

I believe I did:

http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/045924.html

 > what
> stands between me and a +2?

Bug fix priorities, feature freeze exceptions, and review load.

Best,
-jay