Open Stack

Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 07:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> If you think this is wrong and think the "design summit suggestion"
>> website is a better way to do it, let me know why! If some programs
>> really can't stand the 'etherpad/IRC' approach I'll see how we can spin
>> up a limited instance.
> 
> I think this is fine, especially if it's a better reflection of reality
> and lets the teams work more efficiently.
> 
> However, one of the benefits of the old submission system was the
> clarity of the process and openness to submissions from anyone.  We
> don't want to be in a situation where non-core folks feel like they have
> a harder time submitting a session.
> 
> Once this is settled, as long as the wiki pages [1][2] reflect the
> process and is publicized, it should be fine.
> 
> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit
> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Planning

Yes, I'll document the new process and heavily publicize it, once I'm
sure that's the way forward :)

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)