Open Stack

Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> If you think this is wrong and think the "design summit suggestion"
>> website is a better way to do it, let me know why! If some programs
>> really can't stand the 'etherpad/IRC' approach I'll see how we can spin
>> up a limited instance.
> 
> +1 on a collaborative scheduling process within each project.
> 
> That's pretty much what we did within the ceilometer core group for
> the Juno summit, except that we used a googledocs spreadsheet instead
> of an etherpad.
> 
> So I don't think we need to necessarily mandate usage of an etherpad,
> just let every project decide whatever shared document format they
> want to use.
> 
> FTR the benefit of a googledocs spreadsheet in my view would include
> the ease of totalling votes & sessions slots, color-coding candidate
> sessions for merging etc.

Good point. I've replaced the wording in the wiki page -- just use
whatever suits you best, as long as it's a public document and you can
link to it.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)