Open Stack

On 09/10/2014 01:40 PM, stuart.mclaren at hp.com wrote:
> 
> On 09/10/2014 11:52 AM, stuart.mclaren at hp.com wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> The 0.14.0 client breaks all v2 requests when pointed at a glance server
>>> which is running code which is more than a few days old (ie pretty much
>>> any production server).
>>>
>>> There's a band-aid patch here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120143/
>>> and a longer term patch here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120300/
>>>
>>> What would folks propose we do to avoid having a broken client for
>>> an extended period of time (days)?
>>>
>>> Would merging 120143 and releasing it as 0.14.1 be a reasonable short
>>> term
>>> solution which would allow less pressured reviewing of 120300?
>>>
> 
>> Why do you think landing 120300 will take long? If both patches are
>> already on gerrit, I'd rather review the real fix.
> 
>> Is there a reason you think landing 120143 first is better?
> 
> 120300 is a biggish change (several hundred lines) and I was concerned
> it might take a while to go through the review cycle.  However, the
> consensus seems to be to go directly with 120300 -- that it shouldn't
> take too long to get through. (And its on-demand schema behaviour is
> a nice bonus too!)
> 

+1 lets go with that!

> 
>> Flavio
> 


-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco