On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Stanislaw Bogatkin <sbogatkin at mirantis.com> wrote: > >So I think that we need to start on [3]. As this is required for OSt > public > >endpoint SSL and also for Fuel SSL it can be quicker to make a first stage > >where a self-signed certificate is managed from nailgun and a second stage > >with the docker CA... > So, yes, I think that it is good idea, cause it will be good base for [2] > and [3] > > [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/ca-deployment > [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-ssl-endpoints > [3] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/ssl-endpoints > +1 I totally agree that we should start with [1] first and later focus on [2] and [3]. I'll also update [2] to adjust it to the plan you proposed. Best, Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140910/4208f4c4/attachment.html>