[openstack-dev] [Designate][Horizon][Tempest][DevStack] Supporting code for incubated projects
Lyle, David
david.lyle at hp.com
Tue Sep 9 21:07:00 UTC 2014
Adding support for incubated projects in Horizon is blocked mainly for
dependency issues. The way Horizon utilizes the python-*clients we force a
requirement on distros to now include that version of the client even
though it is not officially part of OpenStack's integrated release.
Additionally, we've made exceptions and included incubated project support
in the past and doing so has been borderline disastrous from a release
point of view. Things like non-backward compatible client releases have
happened in the RC cycles.
I've been struggling with a better way forward. But including directly in
the Horizon tree, will create problems.
David
On 9/9/14, 8:12 AM, "Sean Dague" <sean at dague.net> wrote:
>On 09/09/2014 07:58 AM, Mac Innes, Kiall wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> While requesting a openstack/designate-dashboard project from the TC/
>>
>> Infra The topic of why Designate panels, as an incubated project,
>>can¹t
>> be merged into openstack/horizon was raised.
>>
>>
>>
>> In the openstack/governance review[1], Russell asked:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hm, I think we should discuss this with the horizon team, then. We
>>are
>> telling projects that incubation is a key time for integrating with
>> other
>> projects. I would expect merging horizon integration into horizon
>>itself
>> to be a part of that.
>>
>>
>>
>> With this in mind I¹d like to start a conversation with the Horizon,
>> Tempest and DevStack teams around merging of code to support
>> Incubated projects What are the drawbacks?, Why is this currently
>> frowned upon by the various teams? And What do each of the parties
>> believe is the Right Way forward?
>
>I though the Devstack and Tempest cases were pretty clear, once things
>are incubated they are fair game to get added in.
>
>Devstack is usually the right starting point, as that makes it easy for
>everyone to have access to the code, and makes the testability by other
>systems viable.
>
>I currently don't see any designate changes that are passing Jenkins
>that need to be addressed, is there something that got missed?
>
> -Sean
>
>--
>Sean Dague
>http://dague.net
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list