Open Stack

The problem lies in this patch:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300

Even If I apply it, i get an error that Unknown Neutron context. The patch
is correctly applied - some 20 times :)

Task and output is as follows:


{

    "VMTasks.boot_runcommand_delete": [

        {

            "args": {

                "flavor": {

                    "name": "m1.tiny"

                },

                "image": {

                    "name": "cirros-0.3.2-x86_64-uec"

                },

                "fixed_network": "net04",

                "floating_network": "net04_ext",

                "use_floatingip": true,

                "script":
"/home/alam/Desktop/rally/doc/samples/tasks/support/instance_dd_test.sh",

                "interpreter": "/bin/sh",

                "username": "cirros"

            },

            "runner": {

                "type": "constant",

                "times": 2,

                "concurrency": 1

            },

            "context": {

                "users": {

                    "tenants": 1,

                    "users_per_tenant": 1

                },
                "neutron_network": {
                    "network_cidr": "10.%s.0.0/16"
                }

            }



        }

    ]

}




$rally -v task start
/home/alam/Desktop/rally/doc/samples/tasks/scenarios/vm/boot-runcommand-delete.json
================================================================================
Task  193a4b11-ec2d-4e36-ba53-23819e9d6bcf is started
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014-09-07 17:23:00.680 2845 INFO rally.orchestrator.api [-] Benchmark Task
193a4b11-ec2d-4e36-ba53-23819e9d6bcf on Deployment
3cba9ee5-ef47-42f9-95bc-91107009a348
2014-09-07 17:23:00.680 2845 INFO rally.benchmark.engine [-] Task
193a4b11-ec2d-4e36-ba53-23819e9d6bcf | Starting:  Check cloud.
2014-09-07 17:23:09.083 2845 INFO rally.benchmark.engine [-] Task
193a4b11-ec2d-4e36-ba53-23819e9d6bcf | Completed: Check cloud.
2014-09-07 17:23:09.084 2845 INFO rally.benchmark.engine [-] Task
193a4b11-ec2d-4e36-ba53-23819e9d6bcf | Starting:  Task validation.
2014-09-07 17:23:09.134 2845 INFO rally.benchmark.engine [-] Task
193a4b11-ec2d-4e36-ba53-23819e9d6bcf | Starting:  Task validation of
scenarios names.
2014-09-07 17:23:09.137 2845 INFO rally.benchmark.engine [-] Task
193a4b11-ec2d-4e36-ba53-23819e9d6bcf | Completed: Task validation of
scenarios names.
2014-09-07 17:23:09.138 2845 INFO rally.benchmark.engine [-] Task
193a4b11-ec2d-4e36-ba53-23819e9d6bcf | Starting:  Task validation of syntax.

================================================================================
Task 193a4b11-ec2d-4e36-ba53-23819e9d6bcf is failed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<class 'rally.exceptions.InvalidBenchmarkConfig'>
Task config is invalid.
    Benchmark %(name)s has wrong configuration at position %(pos)s
    Reason: %(reason)s
    Benchmark configuration: %(config)s





On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) <akalambu at cisco.com
> wrote:

>  Hi mason
> What is the task you want to perform run commands after vm boot or run
> performance
> Based on that I can help with correct pointer
> Ajay
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 5, 2014, at 2:28 AM, "masoom alam" <masoom.alam at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Please forward ur vmtasks.py file
>
> On Friday, September 5, 2014, masoom alam <masoom.alam at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://paste.openstack.org/show/106297/
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:12 PM, masoom alam <masoom.alam at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Ajay
>>>
>>>  I corrected this earlier. But facing another problem. Will forward
>>> paste in a while.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, September 5, 2014, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) <
>>> akalambu at cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Sorry there was  typo in the patch should be @validation and not
>>>> @(validation
>>>> Please change that in vm_perf.py
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:51 PM, "masoom alam" <masoom.alam at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   Why this is so when I patched with your sent patch:
>>>>
>>>>  http://paste.openstack.org/show/106196/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Rick Jones <rick.jones2 at hp.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 09/03/2014 11:47 AM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>> Looking into the following blueprint which requires that network
>>>>>> performance tests be done as part of a scenario
>>>>>> I plan to implement this using iperf and basically a scenario which
>>>>>> includes a client/server VM pair
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  My experience with netperf over the years has taught me that when
>>>>> there is just the single stream and pair of "systems" one won't actually
>>>>> know if the performance was limited by inbound, or outbound.  That is why
>>>>> the likes of
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/doc/examples/
>>>>> netperf_by_flavor.py
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/doc/examples/
>>>>> netperf_by_quantum.py
>>>>>
>>>>> apart from being poorly written python :)  Will launch several
>>>>> instances of a given flavor and then run aggregate tests on the Instance
>>>>> Under Test.  Those aggregate tests will include inbound, outbound,
>>>>> bidirectional, aggregate small packet and then a latency test.
>>>>>
>>>>> happy benchmarking,
>>>>>
>>>>> rick jones
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Sent from noir
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent from noir
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140907/1d6ed992/attachment.html>