[openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

Michael Still mikal at stillhq.com
Sat Sep 6 03:43:29 UTC 2014


Thus, it get approved and added to the etherpad of doom.

Michael

On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:
> I looked at the Tempest change, it should be landable. I'll sign up for
> review on these, as the rest of the patches are pretty straight forward.
>
>         -Sean
>
> On 09/05/2014 06:32 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>> So, this one is looking for one more core. Any takers?
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Day, Phil <philip.day at hp.com> wrote:
>>> The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to Ken'inci):  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1   so its kind of just a question of getting the sequence right.
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Sean Dague [mailto:sean at dague.net]
>>>> Sent: 05 September 2014 17:05
>>>> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas
>>>>
>>>> On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
>>>>> 2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil <philip.day at hp.com>:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for
>>>> server groups.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful anti-
>>>> affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, but
>>>> without some form of quota control to limit the amount of anti-affinity its
>>>> impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a side-
>>>> effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the need to
>>>> protect the change in V2 via yet another extension.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/
>>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/
>>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/
>>>>>
>>>>> I am happy to sponsor this work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Ken'ichi ohmichi
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>> These look like they are also all blocked by Tempest because it's changing
>>>> return chunks. How does one propose to resolve that, as I don't think there
>>>> is an agreed path up there for to get this into a passing state from my reading
>>>> of the reviews.
>>>>
>>>>       -Sean
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sean Dague
>>>> http://dague.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Rackspace Australia



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list