[openstack-dev] [rally][iperf] Benchmarking network performance
Ajay Kalambur (akalambu)
akalambu at cisco.com
Fri Sep 5 05:28:04 UTC 2014
Sorry there was typo in the patch should be @validation and not @(validation
Please change that in vm_perf.py
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:51 PM, "masoom alam" <masoom.alam at gmail.com<mailto:masoom.alam at gmail.com>> wrote:
Why this is so when I patched with your sent patch:
http://paste.openstack.org/show/106196/
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Rick Jones <rick.jones2 at hp.com<mailto:rick.jones2 at hp.com>> wrote:
On 09/03/2014 11:47 AM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) wrote:
Hi
Looking into the following blueprint which requires that network
performance tests be done as part of a scenario
I plan to implement this using iperf and basically a scenario which
includes a client/server VM pair
My experience with netperf over the years has taught me that when there is just the single stream and pair of "systems" one won't actually know if the performance was limited by inbound, or outbound. That is why the likes of
http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/doc/examples/netperf_by_flavor.py
and
http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/doc/examples/netperf_by_quantum.py
apart from being poorly written python :) Will launch several instances of a given flavor and then run aggregate tests on the Instance Under Test. Those aggregate tests will include inbound, outbound, bidirectional, aggregate small packet and then a latency test.
happy benchmarking,
rick jones
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140905/886ffe27/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list