On Sep 3, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Brian Haley <brian.haley at hp.com> wrote: > On 09/03/2014 08:17 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote: >> Given how deep the merge queue is (146 currently), we've effectively >> reached feature freeze in Neutron now (likely other projects as well). >> So this morning I'm going to go through and remove BPs from Juno which >> did not make the merge window. I'll also be putting temporary -2s in >> the patches to ensure they don't slip in as well. I'm looking at FFEs >> for the high priority items which are close but didn't quite make it: >> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/l3-high-availability >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/add-ipset-to-security >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/security-group-rules-for-devices-rpc-call-refactor > > I guess I'll be the first to ask for an exception for a Medium since the code > was originally completed in Icehouse: > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/l3-metering-mgnt-ext > > The neutronclient-side code was committed in January, and the neutron side, > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70090 has had mostly positive reviews since > then. I've really just spent the last week re-basing it as things moved along. > +1 for FFE. I think this is good community that fell through the cracks. mark