[openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit track

Russell Bryant rbryant at redhat.com
Thu Oct 30 18:32:02 UTC 2014


On 10/30/2014 12:12 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 04:53 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Jay Pipes wrote:
>>>> On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>>>> On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
>>>>>> Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack
>>>>>> session or the logging session from their current joint (and
>>>>>> conflicting) time (15:40)?  QA really would be appreciated at both.
>>>>>> And I'd really like to be at both.  I'd say the Refstack one would go
>>>>>> better in the debug slot, as the API stuff is sort of related to the
>>>>>> logging.  Switching with one of the 14:50 sessions might also work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just hoping.  I really want great participation at all of these
>>>>>> sessions.
>>>>>
>>>>> The "gate debugging" session is most likely going to be dropped at this
>>>>> point.  I don't see a big problem with moving the refstack one to that
>>>>> slot (the first time).
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone else have a strong opinion on this?
>>>>
>>>> Sounds good to me.
>>>
>>> Sounds good.
>>>
>>
>> With the "gate debugging" session being  dropped due to being the wrong
>> format to be productive, we now need a new session. After looking over the
>> etherpad of proposed cross project sessions I think there is one glaring
>> omission: the SDK. In the "Kilo Cycle Goals Exercise" thread [0] having a
>> real SDK was one of the top answers. Many folks had great responses that
>> clearly explained the issues end users are having [1].  As for who could
>> lead a session like this I have two ideas: Monty Taylor, who had one of the
>> most colorful explanations to why this is so critical, or Dean Troyer, one
>> of the few people actually working on this right now. I think it would be
>> embarrassing if we had no cross project session on SDKs, since there
>> appears to be a consensus that the making life easier for the end user is a
>> high priority.
>>
>> The current catch is, the free slot is now at 15:40, so it would compete
>> with 'How to Tackle Technical Debt in Kilo,' a session which I expect to be
>> very popular with the same people who would be interested in attending a
>> SDK session.
> 
> I'm happy to lead this, to co-lead with Dean or to just watch Dean lead
> it - although I can promise in any format to start off the time period
> with some very colorful ranting. I think I'm less necessary in the tech
> debt session, as other than "yes, please get rid of it" I probably don't
> have too much more input that will be helpful.

OK, awesome!  I'll put you down for now.

I could use a proposed session description to put on sched.org.
Otherwise, I'll just make something up.

-- 
Russell Bryant



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list