[openstack-dev] TC election by the numbers
Eoghan Glynn
eglynn at redhat.com
Wed Oct 29 23:37:42 UTC 2014
> > On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Eoghan Glynn <eglynn at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I haven't seen the customary number-crunching on the recent TC election,
> > so I quickly ran the numbers myself.
> >
> > Voter Turnout
> > =============
> >
> > The turnout rate continues to decline, in this case from 29.7% to 26.7%.
> >
> > Here's how the participation rates have shaped up since the first TC2.0
> > election:
> >
> > Election | Electorate | Voted | Turnout | Change
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > 10/2013 | 1106 | 342 | 30.9% | -8.0%
> > 04/2014 | 1510 | 448 | 29.7% | -4.1%
> > 10/2014 | 1892 | 506 | 26.7% | -9.9%
>
>
> Overall percentage of the electorate voting is declining, but absolute
> numbers of voters has increased. And in fact, the electorate has grown more
> than the turnout has declined.
True that, but AFAIK the generally accepted metric on participation rates
in elections is turnout as opposed to absolute voter numbers.
Cheers,
Eoghan
> >
> > Partisan Voting
> > ===============
> >
> > As per the usual analysis done by ttx, the number of ballots that
> > strictly preferred candidates from an individual company (with
> > multiple candidates) above all others:
> >
> > HP ahead in 30 ballots (5.93%)
> > RHAT ahead in 18 ballots (3.56%)
> > RAX ahead in 8 ballots (1.58%)
> >
> > The top 6 pairings strictly preferred above all others were:
> >
> > 35 voters (6.92%) preferred Monty Taylor & Doug Hellmann (HP/HP)
> > 34 voters (6.72%) preferred Monty Taylor & Sean Dague (HP/HP)
> > 26 voters (5.14%) preferred Anne Gentle & Monty Taylor (RAX/HP)
> > 21 voters (4.15%) preferred Russell Bryant & Sean Dague (RHAT/HP)
> > 21 voters (4.15%) preferred Russell Bryant & Eoghan Glynn (RHAT/RHAT)
> > 16 voters (3.16%) preferred Doug Hellmann & Sean Dague (HP/HP)
> >
> > Conclusion
> > ==========
> >
> > The rate of potentially partisan voting didn't diverge significantly
> > from the norms we've seen in previous elections.
> >
> > The continuing decline in the turnout rate is a concern however, as
> > the small-scale changes tried (blogging on TC activity, standardized
> > questions in the TC nomination mails) have not arrested the fall-off
> > in participation.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Eoghan
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list