Open Stack

On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track:
> 
> http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#.VFAFFXVGjUa
> 
> If you have any schedule changes to propose for really bad conflicts,
> please let me know.  We really tried to minimize conflicts, but it's
> impossible to resolve them all.
> 
> The next steps are to identify session leads and get the leads to write
> session descriptions to put on the schedule.  We're collecting both at
> the top of the proposals etherpad:
> 
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-summit-topics
> 
> If you were the proposer of one of these sessions and are not already
> listed as the session lead, please add yourself.  If you'd like to
> volunteer to lead a session that doesn't have a lead, please speak up.
> 
> For the sessions you are leading, please draft a description on the
> etherpad that can be used for the session on sched.org.
> 
> Thank you!
> 

I was trying to track down the origin of the "Debugging Gate Failures"
submission -
http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/event/5cfc92906adc5830355ddcedbb95d977
(through matching hex author colors in etherpad... fun!)

It looks like John G copied it over because someone (lost to the mists
of time) put it in the Nova ideas etherpad.

I'd actually argue that a 40 minute interactive session without much
prep isn't going to be all that useful (and honestly probably a terrible
experience for all parties involved). This is a topic that Jay, Dan, and
I have discussed for doing an upcoming bootstrapping hour on (which also
means it would have a long term archived version), and I think that's
probably a better way to do a thing like this.

As there is no owner for this, there is no one to pull it out of the
agenda. But I think it's something that should be considered.

	-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net