[openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel-library merge policy and Fuel CI
Vitaly Kramskikh
vkramskikh at mirantis.com
Tue Oct 28 17:19:06 UTC 2014
Aleksandra,
As you may know, there is a randomly failing nailgun unit test in fuel-web
repo, which fails for the major part of review requests. It's been
happening for a few days. But I need to merge some stuff and cannot wait
for the fix of this well known issue. So for every request with -1 from
Fuel CI I write an explanation why I decided to merge the request. Are you
ok with this? Here is an example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131079/
2014-10-28 23:10 GMT+07:00 Aleksandra Fedorova <afedorova at mirantis.com>:
> Hi everyone,
>
> with recent disruption in our CI process I'd like to discuss again the
> issues in our merge workflow.
>
> See the summary at the end.
>
>
> As a starting point, here is the list of patches which were merged
> into fuel-library repository without "Verified +1" label from Fuel CI:
>
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:stackforge/fuel-library+AND+status:merged+AND+NOT+label:Verified%252B1%252Cuser%253Dfuel-ci,n,z
>
> And the list of merged patches with explicit "Verified -1" label:
>
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:stackforge/fuel-library+AND+status:merged+AND+label:Verified-1%252Cuser%253Dfuel-ci,n,z
>
> There are two common reasons I know why these patchsets exist:
>
> Case 1: "Who cares about CI anyway".
>
> Case 2: These patches can not pass CI because of some real reason,
> which makes Fuel CI result irrelevant.
>
> I am not sure, if i need to comment on the first one, but please just
> remember: CI is not a devops playground made to disrupt your otherwise
> clean and smooth development process. It is an extremely critical
> service, providing the clear reference point for all the work we do.
> And we all know how important the reference point is [1].
>
> So let's move on to the Case 2 and talk about our CI limitations and
> what could possibly make the test result irrelevant.
>
> 1) Dependencies.
>
> Let's say you have a chain of dependent patchsets and none of them
> could pass the CI on its own. How do you merge it?
>
> Here is the trick: the "leaf", i.e. last, topmost patch in the chain
> should pass the CI.
>
> The test we run for this patchset automatically pulls all dependencies
> involved. Which makes Fuel CI result for this patchset perfectly
> relevant for the whole chain.
>
> 2) Environment.
>
> Fuel CI test environment usually uses slightly outdated version of
> Fuel iso image and fuel-main code. Therefore it happens that you write
> and test your patch against latest code via custom iso builds and it
> works, but it can not pass CI. Does it make test results irrelevant?
> No. It makes them even more valuable.
>
> CI environment can be broken and can be outdated. This is the part of
> the process. To deal with these situations we first need to fix the
> environment, then run tests, and then merge the code.
>
> And it helps if you contact devops team in advance and inform us that
> you soon will need the ISO with this particular features.
>
> 3) ?
>
> Please add your examples and let's deal with them one by one.
>
>
> Summary:
>
> I'd like to propose the following merge policy:
>
> 1. any individual patchset MUST have +1 from Fuel CI;
>
> 2. any chain of dependent patchsets MUST have +1 from Fuel CI for the
> topmost patch;
>
> 3. for all exceptional cases the person who does the merge MUST
> explicitly contact devops team, and make sure that there will be
> devops engineer available who will run additional checks before or
> right after the merge. The very same person who does the merge also
> MUST be available for some time after the merge to help the devops
> engineer to deal with the test failures if they appear.
>
>
>
> [1]
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QkCQ_-Id8zI#t=211
>
>
> --
> Aleksandra Fedorova
> Fuel Devops Engineer
> bookwar
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "fuel-core-team" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to fuel-core-team+unsubscribe at mirantis.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/a/mirantis.com/d/optout.
>
--
Vitaly Kramskikh,
Software Engineer,
Mirantis, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141029/aff6d502/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list