[openstack-dev] [neutron][all] Naming convention for unused variables
Dolph Mathews
dolph.mathews at gmail.com
Tue Oct 14 02:37:58 UTC 2014
+1 for readable, well-documented code </bikeshed>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Angus Lees <gus at inodes.org> wrote:
> (Context: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117418/)
>
> I'm looking for some rough consensus on what naming conventions we want for
> unused variables in Neutron, and across the larger OpenStack python
> codebase
> since there's no reason for Neutron to innovate here.
>
> As far as I can see, there are two cases:
>
>
> 1. The "I just don't care" variable
>
> Eg: _, _, filename = path.rpartition('/')
>
> In python this is very commonly '_', but this conflicts with the gettext
> builtin so we should avoid it in OpenStack.
>
> Possible candidates include:
>
> a. 'x'
> b. '__' (double-underscore)
> c. No convention
>
>
> 2. "I know it is unused, but the name still serves as documentation"
>
> Note this turns up as two cases: as a local, and as a function parameter.
>
> Eg: out, _err = execute('df', path)
>
> Eg: def makefile(self, _mode, _other):
> return self._buffer
>
> I deliberately chose that second example to highlight that the leading-
> underscore convention collides with its use for private properties.
>
> Possible candidates include:
>
> a. _foo (leading-underscore, note collides with private properties)
> b. unused_foo (suggested in the Google python styleguide)
> c. NOQA_foo (as suggested in c/117418)
> d. No convention (including not indicating that variables are
> known-unused)
>
>
> As with all style discussions, everyone feels irrationally attached to
> their
> favourite, but the important bit is to be consistent to aid readability
> (and
> in this case, also to help the mechanical code checkers).
>
> Vote / Discuss / Suggest additional alternatives.
>
> --
> - Gus
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141013/e19580b9/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list