Open Stack

On Oct 12, 2014, at 12:32 AM, Li Ma <skywalker.nick at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On 2014/9/17 22:34, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> 
>> The documentation in the oslo.messaging repository [2] would be a good place to start for that. If we decide deployers/operators need the information we can either refer to it from the guides managed by the documentation team or we can move/copy the information. How about if you start a new drivers subdirectory there, and add information about zmq. We can have other driver authors provide similar detail about their drivers in the same directory.
>> 
>> [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.messaging/tree/doc/source
> Hi all, I wrote a deployment guide of ZeroMQ for oslo.messaging, which is located at
> 
> https://github.com/li-ma/zmq-for-oslo
> 
> Do I need to issue a bug or propose a blueprint to trace and merge it to oslo.messaging doc tree?

A wishlist bug would be a good idea for tracking and to ensure that reviews are prioritized.

> 
>>> 3) an analysis of what it would take to be able to run functional
>>> tests for zeromq on our CI infrastructure, not necessarily the full
>>> tempest run or devstack-gate job, probably functional tests we place
>>> in the tree with the driver (we will be doing this for all of the
>>> drivers) + besides writing new functional tests, we need to bring the
>>> unit tests for zeromq into the oslo.messaging repository
>>> 
>>> Kapil Thangavelu started work on both functional tests for the ZMQ
>>> driver last week; the output from the sprint is here:
>>> 
>>>    https://github.com/ostack-musketeers/oslo.messaging
>>> 
>>> it covers the ZMQ driver (including messaging through the zmq-receiver
>>> proxy) and the associated MatchMakers (local, ring, redis) at a
>>> varying levels of coverage, but I feel it moves things in the right
>>> direction - Kapil's going to raise a review for this in the next
>>> couple of days.
>>> 
>>> Doug - has any structure been agreed within the oslo.messaging tree
>>> for unit/functional test splits? Right now we have them all in one place.
>> I think we will want them split up, but we don’t have an agreed existing structure for that. I would like to see a test framework of some sort that defines the tests in a way that can be used to run the same functional for all of the drivers as separate jobs (with appropriate hooks for ensuring the needed services are running, etc.). Setting that up warrants its own spec, because there are going to be quite a few details to work out. We will also need to participate in the larger conversation about how to set up those functional test jobs to be consistent with the other projects.
> That's good to hear someone working on the test stuff. I suggest to deal with the unit tests first for ZeroMQ.
> 
> Anyway, are there any sessions related to this topic in the summit?

We are still working on summit planning. Based on our meeting last week, it looks like we will have a session combining several topics related to oslo.messaging, including what to do with zeromq. The full list of topics and notes is in the etherpad we’re using for planning: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-oslo-summit-topics

Doug

> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev