Open Stack

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 09/10/14 23:44, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> 
> On Oct 9, 2014, at 4:30 PM, Matt Riedemann
> <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> The sqlalchemy-migrate project is basically maintenance mode and
>> the core team [1] is kind of a weird mix of people - all great
>> people I'm sure, but I think it's more a team of people that
>> stepped up when OpenStack took over the project and said they'd
>> babysit it but it's pretty idle.
>> 
>> Given we have oslo.db now, and sqlalchemy-migrate is all DB
>> goodies, can we just have the oslo.db core team [2] own
>> sqlalchemy-migrate now too?
>> 
>> Here are the sqlalchemy-migrate open reviews:
>> 
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate,n,z
>>
>>
>> 
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/186,members
>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/331,members
> 
> If the oslo.db team wants to participate, that’s obviously fine,
> but I don’t think we want to just add everyone in bulk. AIUI, the
> team’s goal is to get the migration stuff in oslo.db working with
> alembic so we can stop using sqlalchemy-migrate.

Till that time, we're left with the library used by multiple projects.
I feel it's hard to get any review in meaningful time for the library,
so if moving the library under the oslo.db tent will help it move, I'm
both hands for that.

/Ihar
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUN7B4AAoJEC5aWaUY1u57JLIH/jn9iREgmRhvfiZosiN9knxV
xrVFgEpZ35G5kGmWrnnnKvbWUIvIawwoA2OCOCMXScL5xwzLtn9+prvcujvGK3g1
/zk1aVKnKv90zR6j0ATgTq49tQQpVVe1KkaePzWRYIkU22f7KAPGmwjQlLfebV06
bWOS5HyUeueAIno67EVY3AM669JtKmS6ZqswIciEfMvsOmdDDrDje1qVUH9VVsoy
UkvOQ+CPCTqwjIpbkbDrfIXJpA5qm0cCwPx8wDoYnEUN7laGjTtV0JMwGKwjBti0
y4ubs0X5xOU2ayr7xJXbeHCSB5eZKVZesbDyOCCk+lIaldih3qN6AR+Snncwjy4=
=Ex7c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----