[openstack-dev] [nova] formally distinguish server "desired state" from "actual state"?
Chris Friesen
chris.friesen at windriver.com
Wed Oct 1 19:07:24 UTC 2014
Currently in nova we have the "vm_state", which according to the code
comments is supposed to represent "a VM's current stable (not
transition) state", or "what the customer expect the VM to be".
However, we then added in an ERROR state. How does this possibly make
sense given the above definition? Which customer would ever expect the
VM to be in an error state?
Given this, I wonder whether it might make sense to formally distinguish
between the expected/desired state (i.e. the state that the customer
wants the VM to be in), and the actual state (i.e. the state that nova
thinks the VM is in).
This would more easily allow for recovery actions, since if the actual
state changes to ERROR (or similar) we would still have the
expected/desired state available for reference when trying to take
recovery actions.
Thoughts?
Chris
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list