[openstack-dev] [all] minimum python support version for juno

Matt Riedemann mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Oct 1 14:27:57 UTC 2014



On 10/1/2014 4:24 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 01/10/14 09:08, Osanai, Hisashi wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to know the minimum python support version for juno. I
>> checked the following memo. My understanding is python 2.6 support
>> will be supported in juno and also dropped before kilo so it will
>> be dropped in one of stable releases in juno. Is this correct
>> understanding?
>
> All stable Juno releases will support Python 2.6. All Kilo releases
> are expected to drop Python 2.6 support.
>
>>
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-cross-project-future-of-python
>>
>>   Want to drop 2.6 ASAP, currently blocked on SLES confirmation that
>> 2.6 is no longer needed Declare intent that it will definitely go
>> away by K (for services) Make sure that every *python module*
>> (dependencies, and not only core projects) that we maintain declare
>> non-support in 2.6 if they stop supporting it
>>
>> Cheers, Hisashi Osanai
>>
>> _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev
>> mailing list OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
>
> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUK8hnAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57sVwH/1hFuICjwHD5RZ+HQnDikkr6
> EN4pI/CGEJFfRRymcml2DhT5O3njZNQCB3Q49qbGrDa2PLUIds5l8s8I6jkkHd3a
> +yw4yshyBNCu+I8cpivKMGfdd6o2xRuI5YUaZLS4td+cfoU2Pt5+tD0M/uiJid86
> rbb+RWCVtE5mHWk84iWLwIpNs72ozUwoYLOuHKI8P3nm1jTffiY8600QzGe1T3DF
> w+2RZ344UKfrRx9+DpJKtl5CRV6jkRMapT1j7u+KWZTwbs0xiGp0FSyKBOJup+oR
> fkvQMg4aZYsHSeXUqNtoXH7HHx/+P7OVMBbB20hjCy7Z/Df/5KEHHOZGYY4QZAs=
> =jgtp
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

Right, and backports could be interesting...but we have to move on at 
some point.

-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list