[openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel master monitoring
sgolovatiuk at mirantis.com
Wed Nov 26 15:40:04 UTC 2014
I would do both to compare. monit and Sensu have own advantages.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Przemyslaw Kaminski <pkaminski at mirantis.com
> We want to monitor Fuel master node while Zabbix is only on slave nodes
> and not on master. The monitoring service is supposed to be installed on
> Fuel master host (not inside a Docker container) and provide basic info
> about free disk space, etc.
> On 11/26/2014 02:58 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> On 11/26/2014 08:18 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
>>> So then in the end, there will be 3 monitoring systems to learn,
>>> configure, and debug? Monasca for cloud users, zabbix for most of the
>>> physical systems, and sensu or monit "to be small"?
>>> Seems very complicated.
>>> If not just monasca, why not the zabbix thats already being deployed?
>> Yes, I had the same thoughts... why not just use zabbix since it's used
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev