Open Stack

Hi,

I would do both to compare. monit and Sensu have own advantages.

--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Przemyslaw Kaminski <pkaminski at mirantis.com
> wrote:

> We want to monitor Fuel master node while Zabbix is only on slave nodes
> and not on master. The monitoring service is supposed to be installed on
> Fuel master host (not inside a Docker container) and provide basic info
> about free disk space, etc.
>
> P.
>
>
> On 11/26/2014 02:58 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> On 11/26/2014 08:18 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
>>
>>> So then in the end, there will be 3 monitoring systems to learn,
>>> configure, and debug? Monasca for cloud users, zabbix for most of the
>>> physical systems, and sensu or monit "to be small"?
>>>
>>> Seems very complicated.
>>>
>>> If not just monasca, why not the zabbix thats already being deployed?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I had the same thoughts... why not just use zabbix since it's used
>> already?
>>
>> Best,
>> -jay
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141126/24b7938f/attachment.html>