Open Stack

Folks,

Maybe I understand some things wrong, but Zabbix is a different story.
We deploy Zabbix per cluster, so it doesn't monitor for *all* slaves
or master node. It monitors only one cluster.

Therefore I see no reasons to choose Zabbix over monit. I mean, it
shouldn't be "We MUST use Zabbix because we use it for our clusters".

- Igor

P.S: Personally, I'd like to use either Monit or Sensu.

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/26/2014 08:18 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
>>
>> So then in the end, there will be 3 monitoring systems to learn,
>> configure, and debug? Monasca for cloud users, zabbix for most of the
>> physical systems, and sensu or monit "to be small"?
>>
>> Seems very complicated.
>>
>> If not just monasca, why not the zabbix thats already being deployed?
>
>
> Yes, I had the same thoughts... why not just use zabbix since it's used
> already?
>
> Best,
> -jay
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev