[openstack-dev] [Heat] Order of machines to be terminated during scale down

Maish Saidel-Keesing maishsk+openstack at maishsk.com
Wed Nov 26 14:13:14 UTC 2014


Thanks Pavlo.

Is there any reason why FIFO was chosen?

Maish
On 26/11/2014 12:30, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote:
> Maish,
>
> by default they are deleted in in the same order they were created,
> FIFO style.
>
> Best regards,
> Pavlo Shchelokovskyy.
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing
> <maishsk+openstack at maishsk.com <mailto:maishsk+openstack at maishsk.com>>
> wrote:
>
>     In which order are machines terminated during a scale down action
>     in an
>     auto scaling group
>
>     For example instance 1 & 2 were deployed in a stack. Instances 3 & 4
>     were created as a result of load.
>
>     When the load is reduced and the instances are scaled back down, which
>     ones will be removed? And in which order?
>
>     From old to new (1->4) or new to old (4 -> 1) ?
>
>     Thanks
>
>     --
>     Maish Saidel-Keesing
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
> Software Engineer
> Mirantis Inc
> www.mirantis.com <http://www.mirantis.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-- 
Maish Saidel-Keesing

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141126/3deae923/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list