[openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel master monitoring

Przemyslaw Kaminski pkaminski at mirantis.com
Wed Nov 26 10:50:03 UTC 2014


I agree, this was supposed to be small.

P.

On 11/26/2014 11:03 AM, Stanislaw Bogatkin wrote:
> Hi all,
> As I understand, we just need to monitoring one node - Fuel master. 
> For slave nodes we already have a solution - zabbix.
> So, in that case why we need some complicated stuff like monasca? 
> Let's use something small, like monit or sensu.
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov 
> <mailto:Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov>> wrote:
>
>     One of the selling points of tripleo is to reuse as much as
>     possible from the cloud, to make it easier to deploy. While
>     monasca may be more complicated, if it ends up being a component
>     everyone learns, then its not as bad as needing to learn two
>     different monitoring technologies. You could say the same thing
>     cobbler vs ironic. the whole Ironic stack is much more
>     complicated. But for an openstack admin, its easier since a lot of
>     existing knowlege applies. Just something to consider.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Kevin *
>     *
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* Tomasz Napierala
>     *Sent:* Monday, November 24, 2014 6:42:39 AM
>     *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel master monitoring
>
>
>     > On 24 Nov 2014, at 11:09, Sergii Golovatiuk
>     <sgolovatiuk at mirantis.com <mailto:sgolovatiuk at mirantis.com>> wrote:
>     >
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > monasca looks overcomplicated for the purposes we need. Also it
>     requires Kafka which is Java based transport protocol.
>     > I am proposing Sensu. It's architecture is tiny and elegant.
>     Also it uses rabbitmq as transport so we won't need to introduce
>     new protocol.
>
>     Do we really need such complicated stuff? Sensu is huge project,
>     and it's footprint is quite large. Monit can alert using scripts,
>     can we use it instead of API?
>
>     Regards,
>     -- 
>     Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala
>     Sr. OpenStack Engineer
>     tnapierala at mirantis.com <mailto:tnapierala at mirantis.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141126/93b08f8e/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list